In a notable U-turn, former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and YSRCP president YS Jagan Mohan Reddy has said his party was wrong to back the 2023 law that changed how India's Election Commissioners are appointed. Speaking to reporters at Tadepalli on Sunday after meeting State Election Commissioner Anil Chandra Punetha, Jagan said, "We regret committing that mistake."

His remarks come at a time when the opposition across the country is questioning the independence of the Election Commission, and as Andhra Pradesh heads into local body elections with the YSRCP alleging that its candidates are being blocked from filing nominations.

What is the 2023 law Jagan is talking about?

The law in question is the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under it, the President appoints the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners on the recommendation of a selection committee made up of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister.

Before the law, a Supreme Court ruling had placed the Chief Justice of India on the panel alongside the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. The YSRCP, which then had a sizeable presence in Parliament, supported the 2023 Bill when it was passed.

WhoYS Jagan Mohan Reddy, YSRCP president
WherePress conference at Tadepalli, Andhra Pradesh
WhenSunday, October 18, 2026
Law in focusCEC and Other ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023
Current panelPM, Leader of Opposition, Union minister nominated by PM
Jagan's demandBring back the CJI; reform State Election Commissioner appointments too

Jagan's argument: 'A flaw in the system'

Jagan said the current structure gives the ruling side two votes against one, since both the Prime Minister and the minister he nominates sit on the panel. "This is a flaw in the system," he said. Using a simple classroom comparison, he said "an examiner cannot be appointed by a student", meaning that those who contest elections should not pick the people who referee them.

He called for the earlier arrangement, with the Chief Justice of India on the committee, to be restored, saying this would make the body neutral. Jagan also wants a similar change at the state level. He suggested that State Election Commissioners should be chosen by a panel involving the Chief Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and possibly the Chief Justice of the High Court. "Such reforms are necessary to restore public confidence in elections," he said.

Allegations against the TDP-led government

The bigger target of Jagan's remarks was closer to home. He alleged that State Election Commissioner Punetha was appointed by Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and was acting on the Chief Minister's directions, and he raised a complaint with the SEC about the ongoing local body poll process.

Jagan alleged that YSRCP candidates were being denied caste certificates, no-objection certificates and other documents needed to file nominations, and that police were summoning candidates under bind-over proceedings. He also alleged that YSRCP nominees were attacked near nomination centres in some places, including Punganur and Pulivendula. These are allegations made by the YSRCP chief; the TDP, the state government, the police and the State Election Commission had not responded to them in the reports available at the time of writing.

Why this matters for Andhra Pradesh and national politics

Jagan's change of position adds a southern regional voice to an opposition campaign that has been gathering momentum. Parties such as the Congress and the DMK, and the Kerala Assembly, have recently raised concerns about the Election Commission's leadership. YSRCP has usually kept its distance from the INDIA bloc, so its criticism of the 2023 law could be read as a sign that it is rethinking its approach towards the Centre.

For voters in Andhra Pradesh, the immediate issue is the local body elections. A smooth and fair nomination process is essential for the polls to be credible, and any dispute between the main opposition party and the State Election Commission is likely to play out in the coming weeks, possibly in court.

What happens next

The State Election Commission is expected to examine the YSRCP's complaint. A response from the TDP and the state government to Jagan's allegations is awaited. Nationally, the debate over how Election Commissioners are appointed is likely to continue in Parliament and in the courts.

Also Read